No. 20-7950

Antonio Serrano-Perez v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law criminal-law due-process felony-offense illegal-reentry immigration-law prior-conviction sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation supreme-court
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-06-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court should overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States and hold that a prior conviction is an element of the aggravated form of the illegal reentry offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The default penalty range for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) is a sentence of “not more than 2 years” in prison. Petitioner was sentenced to 10 years in prison, based on the sentencing court’s determination that he was previously removed from the United States “subsequent to conviction for commission of ... a felony.” § 1326(b)(1). Under this Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), the existence of the prior conviction was not an “element” of the aggravated form of the offense found in § 1326(b). The question presented is whether this Court should overrule AlmendarezTorres. i

Docket Entries

2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 7, 2021)

Attorneys

Antonio Serrano-Perez
James Matthew WrightOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
James Matthew WrightOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent