No. 20-7951

Eduardo Flores v. Peter M. Hoagland, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-05-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment ada-1990 americans-with-disabilities-act court-accommodation disability due-process equal-access judicial-procedure self-represented self-represented-litigant
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego County and the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District violated the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution and the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 by failing to provide Mr. Flores, a disabled self-represented litigant, with meaningful accommodation and equal access to the court

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED (Rule 14.1(a)) Whether the Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego County and the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District violated the 14° Amendment of the | United States Constitution and the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 by failing to provide Mr. Flores, a disabled self-represented litigant, with meaningful accommodation and equal access to the court.

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-11-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-10-21
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
Supplemental brief of petitioner Eduardo Flores filed. (Distributed)
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 7, 2021)

Attorneys

Eduardo Flores
Eduardo Flores — Petitioner