Wesley Brian Earnest v. Keith W. Davis, Warden, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Should courts procedurally time-bar a pro-se-inmate's habeas-corpus petition when a prison-official with a serious-health-illness is responsible for the untimely filing?
No question identified. : Questions Resented () a. Should courts Procedurally time=bar a pro se inmetes habeas Corpus then a priser official with a sericus health illness, such as COVTD ~ 19, is Tesgonsible For “the untimely Filing P Or, should "Extraordinary Circumstances” be recognized and = Equitable Telling granted P (This is of notional Importance with th Covrp-i4 parkeae) b. Sheuld couets recognize “Petual Trnocence ancl ) constitutional rights Vielatioas as Ground s te remove proceducal time-bars jn a habeas erpus T | C Lewer coucts are divided on this issue). | Q) a. Sheuld trial courts Preveat deferdaats the use of exenerating DNA Cloloed and aie) Simply because th DNA is not yer reoistered ia a@ Criminal database and the Thiedparty dence 13 uakKacuial lo, Should trial courts Supplact — Scientific DNA | evidence with mere Ciccumstartial eviderce, or Would this led te a surge in Wrongful Convictions Nationwide, Significantly dimicishing the public | Confidence tn the yedicial system? an . : 21J10 aUBAALD . ,