Whether the prohibition of a criminal appeal with denial after exercising the right to appeal a reserved appealable request when their rules and set where a clause or such post-appeal claim, plea with-drawl in Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b) deprives the petitioner of due process as protected in the U.S. Const. 14th Amend.

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Now 1s Me Slee ob Fig. Sable lo deny Due Process vig Prohibition 02 @ Criminal Phen With denwal alter exerening the tmnt to Appeal a Reserved APBealable Zeque when thetr Rules anh Set whee erevle a Clause er Suen PostAppeal eam, Plea withclmuel in Fla, 2, Cam, P. Fule * 312) ; PL S#924,054 ? 6) Ts thy Pla, Court's Opnmion in Poremge. "3g Calender day $* te withdraw 0 crimmel Baa dePrivinge me of Due Preess ‘ gecenteech in the US, Const, 1S ans” Cie Amenck , Poleated , hy tne \yth Amend, when a clause 1g Created (tsi trout governing bounelries) altering, the circumstances eKeolrna. Right fea wikh ra weel. eondlitions , Requirements, and. Threshot le? Park Hes