No. 20-7969

Refugio Agustin-Pineda v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure due-process immigration-law immigration-proceedings jurisdiction jurisdictional-requirements notice-to-appear removal-proceedings statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-06-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government may commence removal proceedings by serving a noncitizen with a 'notice to appear' that fails to specify the hearing's time and place

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Congress has determined the "sole and exclusive procedure" for certain removal proceedings. 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(3). To commence these proceedings, the government must serve noncitizens with a "notice to appear" specifying the proceedings' "time and place." Jd. § 1229(a)(1)(G)(). The agency's implementing regulations define "notice to appear" differently-they do not require a "notice to appear" to specify the proceedings' time and place. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.15(b). The Board of Immigration Appeals applies the regulation's definition and not the statutory definition. The questions presented are: 1. Whether the government may commence removal proceedings by serving a noncitizen with a "notice to appear" that fails to specify the hearing's time and place. 2. Whether the failure to include the time and place of an immigration hearing in the initial notice to appear results in the immigration court lacking jurisdiction such that any orders therein are not useable in a subsequent criminal proceeding under 8 U.S.C. Sect. 1326. i

Docket Entries

2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Refugio Agustin-Pineda
Dan B. JohnsonLaw Office of Dan B. Johnson PS, Petitioner
Dan B. JohnsonLaw Office of Dan B. Johnson PS, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent