Leonard Patti v. George C. Peck, Jr.
Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Why was I denied my right to a trial by jury, or even a hearing on the case?
Questions Presented: . . 1. Why was | denied my right to a trial by jury, or even a hearing on the case? The only thing : that had any bearing on this case was the Affidavit of Merit: So, why wasn’t the doctrine of Common knowledge considered? . 2. Why is the Affidavit of Merit, an unholy, prejudice law, for a special interest : group, considered a law? Is this racism? . 3. Did not the affidavit of merit give Dr. Peck Jr. the license to assault me? z 4, Why is the law, i.e. the Affidavit of Merit, put before the facts in my case? Is not ’ the purpose of the law to judge the facts? 5. Why wasn’t I told the implant could not be removed, even before the fourth operation? Obviously, that is a lie. So, if the implant could not be removed, why did Dr. Peck Jr. operate? . 6. According to: The Doctrine of Informed Consent and Refusal, I have been assaulted . : four times: Isn’t the Doctrine of Informed Consent and Refusal also a law? So why was assault not a cause of action, in The N.J: Superior Court? ; | 7. Was not George Peck Jr. covering his tracks, for the statute of limitations when : ~ he did the subsequent operations? i.e. the three subsequent assaults? ’ 8. What, amlapractice cadaver? .