No. 20-7970

Christopher R. Glenn v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review counsel-misconduct due-process evidentiary-hearing fraud ineffective-assistance judicial-proceedings supervisory-power
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-06-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Eleventh Circuit so far depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Question #1: Did the Eleventh Circuit so far depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise of this Court’s supervisory power when it sanctioned the Southern District of Florida’s finding that Glenn’s claims, well pled from personal knowledge, that his counsel had rendered ineffective assistance by defrauding him, misleading him, and, tendering a false document to the Court could be dismissed without either response , or , an evidentiary hearing? . -i IN THE : SUPREME ‘COURT OF THE UNITED STATES © . PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI . : . : Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW a 1X] For cases from federal courts: ; The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at

Docket Entries

2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Christopher Glenn
Christopher Glenn — Petitioner
Christopher Glenn — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent