No. 20-7973
Zavion Nunley v. United States
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split data-availability judicial-discretion nationwide-statistics reasonableness-of-sentence sentencing-disparities sentencing-disparity sentencing-guidelines statistical-analysis unwarranted-disparities
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-06-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether statistics demonstrating that judges in the sentencing district impose sentences much more frequently than their peers in other district are relevant to an appellate court's evaluation of the reasonableness of a sentence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether statistics demonstrating that judges in the sentencing district impose sentences much more frequently than their peers in other district are relevant to an appellate court’s evaluation of the reasonableness of a sentence. i
Docket Entries
2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Zavion Nunley
James Matthew Wright — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner