No. 20-7976
Treyton Lee Thomas v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 8th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-provision court-filing due-process excessive-fines incorporation jurisdictional-issue legal-document scotus-petition writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2021-06-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . / dlientce ae Catesdment fpepatgy Ce Mehr Ablccmest Ay Adv 0Ca7in ed for DY OSU CT AA OF FUG CE Sescenen Gu OECIWNES EN MOACENENT, Z. Otis. awe balms ALS¢ET AN er ME. Topmac La, y ar an d us WELLE for fF GureeiNex KebucvioN PECAntEe | (Ff 7 : QW TEN Zz POINTS Pore AVCCGET ACE, OFF LES 0p) S113) 7H 48 VALI, I tht Up. Shona! SA BHte, Aer) WOE CAVED VTE fp Ofe “vp Su SMI Vey 0A LASIAIBE,
Docket Entries
2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 9, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent