Whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated by the imposition of a sentence enhancement created after the commission of the offense

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ey CAR, PLEADINGS FEM UNBETLR RED Conwrextph BE GALENGED Paes TK TIME wsrtet “khENy, TG MET 7 &) GAY “TATRA Dteah FARING, To Piteonern EIN AX A Sey ENoe KIT CREATED AFTER COINERION OF OFFENS' re IK . E AND Seurencis WITH STAND “THE PDATBTEENS OF DUE OmDoKeR CLALRE Fane NOWRMENG, 2 ) DMENIY ROR PETE AWN BE HAD Noe Sere ot © Caw To Sustitk WHETHER PLEASIUGS REFODE AN DOWER Cougy CHALKE KOC, COAMCTTOS oF SENTENCES METRO ft COMAETE GECDED XB ALY | 4 ol QUESTIONGS PRESENTED 4) \ARETHER RETHERIeIVE DAR GYERTED BR LEQ WTS) TO RORDEE PRE-BaEMNG, Guaenactees VE WHat? Brands, f | THRINS PROTECTED COMNeTCTUTIDA, RIORT COUFEMED 3K) BM Post Fae PEC ALATTALS °