Where jurisdiction was never established, in an arrest and prosecution resulting from an alleged and unwarranted traffic stop with violations of rights protected by the Constitution, is it lawful for the court to grant summary judgement and affirm without review?

Question Presented Where jurisdiction was initially questioned and never established or proven on the record, in an arrest and prosecution resulting from an “alleged” and unwarranted “traffic stop” with several violations of rights protected by the Constitution, including but not limited to right to travel, the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, is it lawful for the court to grant defendants’ motion for summary judgement and the Circuit (reviewing) court to affirm judgment via respondents’ motion to affirm without review, briefing and/or arguments? ¥ 2 \ \ Page 2 of 14