Whether reasonable jurists would determine that the holding in Ramos v. Louisiana applies to persons on direct appeal concerning the non-unanimous jury instructions

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Reasonable jurists would determine that the holding in Raztos_v.. Loxisiana would apply to persons on Direct Appeal concerning the non-unanimous fury Instructions. 2. Reasonable jurists would determine that Mr. Primeaux was denied his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to a fair and impartial trial, and that the district court erred in denying the Motion for Mistrial due to the prosecutor's improper remarks.