Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED a 1, Was Matwyuks Due Process and Equal Protection and Constitutional Rights violated when trial counsel failed to investigate exculpatory evidence. I.E. Matwyuks proof of residency, proof of alleged victims motive to attack Matwyuk, proof that the alleged victims planned a physical attack against Matwyuk, proof that attack by alleged victims was made against ‘Matwyuk and proof that Det. Delong, being a cousin of the alleged victims falsified reports and mishandled and tampered with evidence? 2, Was Matwyuks Constitutional Due Process rights violated when the lead Detective, (Det. Delong), while related to the alleged victims, remained in the capacity of the lead investigator in Matwyuks case? 3. Was Matwyuks denial by the trial court to represent himself a Constitutional Due Process Violation under the 14° Amendment? 4. Was Matwyuks 6" Amendment Due Process right to be represented by effective counsel violated by 1) his first attorney failing to inform him of a plea agreement offered by the state, and 2) His second attorney failing to convey multiple pleas to Matwyuk, instead filing a “Rule 11” against him, which he was ultimatly declared competent to stand trial? 5. Was Matwtuks 6" and 14" Constitutional Ammendmaent rights violated when the state solicited previously precluded testimony of Alicia Dena, and counsel failing to object to it? 6. Was Matwyuks 14"* Amendment Constitutional rights violated by counsels (cumulative) Ineffective Assistance of Counsel errors?