Whether the district court was correct in denying petitioner's motion to compel production of documents and whether the court of appeals denied petitioner due process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ’ 1. Would jurists of reason Sind i+ debatable whether the district court was correct in 15 devral ‘of habeas pet tioner’s ‘thetion to Compel Productton of Documents and did the court of appeals deny petiener Ave erecess at a meaningtv\. Time and in Ok mean ing fy) manner Where it ordered resyond ent “do Serve petitioner” the relevant dovumerits after disposition of the case Q Suggested answers Yes, as to bith conjunctive clauses above, OQ, Wheee Ground One for ceWef states “Plea of nolo contendere | Was rendaved involuntary unknowing Lwhere} Commonweal, breached @ea Agreement,” would pris o& veason debate bol, te Aisteick court's deter mthatton of vnitimeliness and the appellate cours tetermination hak pedittoner failed So shade wm valid . claim of a dental of a comnstitudtonal right 2 Suggested answer: Yes, as to beth conjunctive clauses above, Be Weld guritts of ceaSon debate whether The istrict court as correck Sn denying as vitimely pettHoner’s clatm that the: chee courd’s refusal +o correct the erroneous public record oe had rendered his plea involuntary / unknowing’ So Suggested avsuers Ves,