Did the Court of Appeals err in expanding the inevitable-discovery doctrine to affirm the admission of evidence obtained during an unlawful search?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the Court of Appeals err in expanding the inevitable discovery doctrine to affirm the admission of evidence obtained during an unlawful search, where the police officer conceded it did not “occur” to him “to go and... get a warrant” at the outset of the search, and did not “want[] to get the warrant” until after conducting the unlawful search? i