When there is no requirement to file a notice of appeal when applying for a certificate of appealability, is the COA seeker's Fifth Amendment right to due process violated when her COA application is dismissed as untimely for failure to follow a non-existent, non-promulgated procedural process?

Question Presented When there is no requicementdo file a notice of appeal when Applying for a Certiticate of appealability cor’) fromthe circuit tourt and no process Set-foah in . Khe Federal Code and Rules for seeking this CoA inorder +o appeal the dental of a motion Under $2255, is the CoAseekar's Flin Amerdment rigiti to due process Vidlated when her CoA-aeplication is dismissed as | unk mely for Failure to fotlow a non existent, Nor-promwigared procedural process" b Y . ; buck v. Davis, | (37 SCE 199 (Low) tt 8 T . Statutes 2B USC $2753 19 USC.2U285 ©. 6 es tt te Paasim ; Rules : Fed. Rho Sot te RQ. ev. Sock. 2265 Ore Wer ts Sle . R. Gov. Sek. 2258 Foe IL a List of forties All parties appear inthe caption of the case onthe — Cover page. oo Related Cases . United Stakes v. Giron, MDAL-CR WOPB(OMM. 2013), ffir. cA by, No. 13-1A@lek Cie. 2014), Cerk. dented bpm \4-GHB\ (2015) United States vBiron, NO. Iy-Cv108-6 (ON: ZOV1) . Biron Vv. United Stabes, No. 1S-ITO5iCist Lic 2619) ehrey dented 20083, pebFor certs pending Biron Vv. United States, no, (81A (st Lic. 2014) relieg denied 2020, get. for Eck pendin . ~ Biron v: United Stakes, No. . (445 Usk Cir Zoid) denying leave ty Rle successive S 2255 motion YM Retitioner, Lisa hk. Biron) ¥% expec ally requests that c uorit of ceclorart issue to review the || dajent andopinten ok the United SalesCouccot Appeals tir the Ficet Gceuit, Case NO. 1B-222e, afieming the judgrment against her, Proe 2edinas and Ook nin ray Gel ols) The Max) 2, 2014 Tudgment of the Court of Agoeals forthe Firat Crreuit appears at Kypeendix L to this Pelton and is . unpubliched. The Noventber 12,2020 Ocder o& he Couck of Ageeals Soe the Ficst Givcuit deryin rehearing ar \ \ pears ar