No. 20-8037
Quintin Phillippe Jones v. Texas
IFP
Tags: atkins-v-virginia constitutional-law death-penalty due-process expert-testimony fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus intellectual-disability retroactive-rule retroactivity
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment CriminalProcedure Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment CriminalProcedure Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Moore v. Texas establish a new retroactive rule of constitutional law?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does Moore v. Texas, 137 8.Ct. 1039 (2017) establish a new retroactive rule of constitutional law that Petitioner is eligible for but could not present in prior habeas proceedings? 2. Are a defendant’s due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment violated when a jury’s decision to impose the death penalty was based on expert testimony that has since been discredited?
Docket Entries
2021-05-19
Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.
2021-05-19
Application (20A166) referred to the Court.
2021-05-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
Application (20A166) denied by the Court.
2021-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 16, 2021)
2021-05-17
Application (20A166) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
The State of Texas