Carl Wayne Buntion v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment
Whether carrying out the execution of a man who has spent thirty years under a sentence of death would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments or amount to an unnecessary infliction of excessive punishment if neither retribution nor deterrence would be served
Questions Presented If neither of the two purposes this Court has deemed to be a legitimate purpose for the death penalty—i.e., retribution and deterrence— would be served by carrying out the execution of a man who has spent thirty years under a sentence of death, would carrying out that execution violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments or amount to an unnecessary infliction of excessive punishment? Is the death penalty as applied in Texas inherently arbitrary and therefore a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment? ii