Whether the entire affidavits of probable cause are based on completely material perjury

No question identified. : . QUESTION(S). PRESENTED 4. Whether Yhe entive affidavits of pre balole cause are based on completly Moakerial Fer\ury 2 2. Whether the aovernment Mealy searched , Seizure and Corfeiture properties Not mentioned or deseribe in the search warrant ? 3. Whether oMiant betective Ryan Mona intentionally and did Knowingly Commit Moterial Ferjury on Grand Sury Procedure ? 4 Whether offiants meonsistant testimony avnde District Court +o deny Suppression hearing ? s. Whether the Miants Committed acme to receive and . order reliable confidential informant +o continue providing the neoorialole items 2 6 Whether the Judicial process alow's the govern ment to violate the Bue process clause of Pair trial in order to olotaim a conviction? T Whether the y™ Amendment allows police officers to extend their search, seizure and forfeiture into Properties NOT mentioned or describe \n Nhe search Woarrank 2 (2) 8 Uhelher the Wiskriet Courk allows un Sair trial , CrawSord violation , denied CrossConfrontabion violation, prosecutorial misconduct , olouse of power and materi a\ Qer\ary ? gq, Whether both Courk's accephed the inconsistance testimonies of ofionts as Complete reliable and trusted 2 io. Whether petibioner prove with ony douth thok the Nishrict Courk and third Circuit Courk of Appeals decision is in conSlict and contradiction with the outcome of the entire Process? él. Whether bistriek Sudae cesuse ho correch ne conflict ond Contradiction violate the Magistrate Ack ond Article art 34) $2,CL.1 of the Constitution ° 12. Whether Nistrict Sudge violate Haloeas Rule eb) and “Sue Process Clause” of the FSth and Fourkeen Amend ment? . 13Whether the entire Cubicial system allows the Stolen items to be considered as Comoletly LEGAL ? Whether the Judicial system allow's offiants to commit Mokeriol ‘Yer\ury ond NOT be prosecuted? (3) |