1. Whether the entire affidavits of probable cause are based on completly Material Perjury?

2. Whether the government illegally searched, seizure and forfeiture properties Not mentioned or describe in the search warrant?

3. Whether a affiant Detective Ryan Mong intentionally and did Knowingly commit Material Perjury on Grand Jury Procedure?

4. Whether affiants inconsistant testimony guide District Court to deny suppression hearing?

5. Whether the affiants committed a crime to receive and e relb cenan n the negotiable items?

6. Whether the Judicial process allow's the government to violate the"Due process clause" of fairtrial in order to obtain a conviction?

7. Whether the Amendment allows police officers to extend their search, seizure and forfeiture into properties NoT menitioned or described in the search warrant?

8. Whether the District Court allows unfair trial, Crawford vilation, deniedcross-confrontation vilation, prsecutial misconduct, abuse of power and material perjury?

9. Whether both Court's accepted the inconsistance testimonies of affiants as complete reliable and trusted?

10. Whether petitioner prove with any douth that the District Court and Third Circuit Court of Appeals decision is in conflict and contradiction with the outcome of the entire process?

11. Wheter District Judge refuse to crrect the conflit and Contradiction violate the Magistrate Act and Article 1 $1, s2,cL.1 of the Constitution?

12. Whether District Judge violate Habeas Rule 8lb and "Due Process Clause" of the Fifth and Fourteen Amendment?

13. Whether the entire Judicial system allow's the Stolen items to be considered as completly LEGAL?

14. Whether the Judicial system allow's affiants to commit Material Perjury and Not be prosecuted?

Whether the entire affidavits of probable cause are based on completely material perjury