No. 20-8057
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: border-search civil-rights electronic-devices electronic-privacy forensic-examination fourth-amendment reasonable-suspicion warrantless-search
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-11-05
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a warrantless forensic search at a border by agent of the United States of electronic cell phones and computers, lacking a reasonable suspicion, violated the Fourth Amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a warrantless forensic search at a border by agent of the United States of electronic cell phones and computers, lacking a reasonable suspicion, violated the Fourth Amendment? ‘ | ii
Docket Entries
2021-11-08
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner DENIED.
2021-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-09-22
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-10
Rescheduled.
2021-05-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent