Has the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Has the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or sanctioned such a departure by a , lower court, as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power when: | a) United States Supreme Court precedent was applied in violation of Haines v. | Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 b) Same Circuit precedent, which would have required a different result, was ignored by Courts where no findings on precedent applicability in Orders c) District Court rules on Certificate of Appealability while Motion to Disqualify is pending d) Court subverts 4th Amendment protections by concealing fact that underlying affidavit for search warrant didn't merely omit the street address actually searched, in fact, a completely different street address is averred in the underlying affidavit in violation of Leon's 3rd exception | 2. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court, or has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court when, inter alia: a) The Sixth Circuit effectively holds that Liteky, 510 U.S. at 555, as it relates to 'the rarest circumstances’ evincing judicial bias, will never be debatable by ‘reasonable jurists' when no extrajudicial source is involved, for purposes of a Certificate of Appealability b) The Sixth Circuit effectively holds that Townsend, 372 U.S. at 313 does not require ‘merits of the factual dispute' to be resolved when adjudicating claims of judicial bias [ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. _ : : [x] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of : all