Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's habeas corpus petition on the ground that he failed to exhaust state court remedies, in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A)

Questions Presented nnn ne te went) ist of Porte ii Related (ase : : Cid Git) ble OF COntrots .. iv) Hole mt Pbutmoritics Cittcl os eae ‘ waa aa V)(xi) Ooashtvienyal Ginci Strahorn: Prowisio Ayo cena aaans\ 5 st eit OF tine Case, .. ; o\2 Questo lies as . rooeneet431 2SHOn Bene ene ee Ot en eg SUH 34 rh Gcate of Compliance _ ; Kepeadiv AOr Lina) AN Agen ent OF ComMichad _ Appecdiv B: Denict of Writ OF Mardarnys Apptiactin C Ordlev of Dismissal of Writ of Habeas Corpus a Aepeochy. D1S U.S.C. Section 3143 TRE OF NTHORITES COTE Meorta. MATEN GS ce cee ee ee ee ee cae te ee eect e ee ees BD 355 US. 38 Ob. Ed.274.9, 19 5.G. 103 ast A\iaa v. Perini . a 22 LX Su 00 IHU (np 10 \GIO Bakey v. ollan . . . . AS U3 US. al L.Ed. 2.433, 995.61, dus (iGng Pevder v. United State: eae 22 995 US.1S, 19 Eel 134 55S5.C4. Uda(lo , : Blackmon v. od oso 9 9s 3% 22 F.3d. 5U0 [S* civ. 199 ; 20 clio, v. Bis! . : . 20 5 23 A. 28.4), NOS 5S. Ce. 2225 (dag (Swen Vv. Jo om . — . 21,24 : 30 US. 19, 83 LED. USS, 545.4. 4a (i049 Class v. United State _ ae 25 MOD.) .Ed. 2d." I285.Ch. 14g (pols _ ; Mi CF SAC TAmento V. Lew) . wees , 5d3 U.5.%33, UD L.Ed. 2d. 104m WZsS.c. Woe (aqg) : __Estote of Prillins v. District of (olumbiGw ee BS —___Ex Parte Bolliman and Ey Parte S2crtot ee IO SUS 5,2LEd ssudgoy 319 U.S. 291, GL Ed. 20. S37 235.4. 892 GLa) FGA gO VU HA SHOMS NY __. DUCA Ne UDI SIOMG «+ one ee ee ee te oe we ee wee tte ees OD Uc U.S. 150, DL Ed. 2d. Wo, OS. C+. 13 ans). lunar v. Doninet hi Lot tee ; : \ jaas v. Wovicle Ne: ey Discos o i 20 YS4 US. SLs, WU Ed. 204, 22 3S. Ck Woo 62 _ Horvic VBA eee BE 36 E27. 390 (4 Gy. Iai . Haws v. Nelso . . 22 __ Ce S. lo, MAL. ECL asl, & Ct. IOfZ2R UG _ mie: GAN Vv. UiGgudi tj... : os 2 . Ze we Finlidanu Vv. Jolaston.,. : . . 23 _ 313 US. 249, SS L.Ed. i2aa, UIS.G. 1015 (G4 | _ Houston ve Lack . 3\ __. 303 US, 483, 2) Ld 2c. NS, 84S. ch. 9 ida) _ _ | . Wansac v. Boge VS ee ee et es LO G\7 F.2d. (age UO Gr. 1490) . . Jaint PotiFascist Refiacee Commnitice v. Mc Gratin 240 ___ 34) 8.133, 95 Ed SI, WS.G. G34 gsi) _. . Sones Vv. Cin OGG wo. 22 _ SILLS. 23u, 4 L.Ed. 2d.385 %35.04.313 Gauz) . a —Sonesv: Sladliw e e e ; SR FE.20. (S18 AS Cin 1GI1Z) a _ _ Link v. Unittd States ee BS : 3S Ftd. 707 (& Civ. 14S) Mdloriuv. WOOASOT ee 2 YO LS, SO4, Bi LEA, 24.437, 1JO4S.. 2Su3 (lagu) Mario. Stott ee In Na ttoy v. Stott . pe oo 1a ott 22 Sori F.2d ON (1 Ge WT Me.Cle Nain Vv. Upuag peas se ps oe ae . In D1 R20. 40 (ue Ge. 110 : _ _ Yooneu v. Holohan . : ss 24,35 244 US, 10% N4 L.Ed. 19), 558.4. 340 (1438) abel OS Slo, LEAS S.CF. 25 Wazs Mir: Vv. Carn : oe se + 24 : uy US, 41 L.Ed. 2d. 347, loWS.C. 9429 (agus Nopue vy TOS ee 3S | 3LO VS. au, ZL.Edq. 2d. 1317 19S. G4. 143 1954) : Palmer Vv. ASIC oe ee ee BS ZWD U.S. 134 GL L.Ed. 154 12 S44. IG ast) _ Perpttars RO, 2 oe wee et ee te ce ee ee, bl 34) 1.8.54 20 L.Ed. 20.4du, 8 S.Cr ISU (igus) QU US.47S , SUL Ed. 20434, 935.04. 1Z97 11973), _ _ Price v. dohnste ee ee ee tt ee el , 334 US, dul, Fa L.Ed. 125t,, UES. Cr 1OUG (442) , Rub jv Unitd Stalks... 2. ee pe ee Vd | ZU\ F.2d. SES (4% Cie. laus), a a Puizv Cady... ce . 23 WULO Fad. 340 O Cr. iGO) Salomon v. LaValle eee ee eee, pone ee 23 YO5 FS pe. 14g Od. Civ 14714) Santobelio v. Mie Uork a a pe we . 21, 23,36 YOu WS, YS, 30 L.Ed. 2d 47 Gas. 4asdan) Simmons v. Dalslheimn we, a ys Staak ¥ Doages see ee 20 ASE 20. S71: ( Hp P40) Stoot vi Cain. 3i S10 F.2d. UG (S* Gr 9009 Ivpaiiny. Clana ; _ . in __. SABES, 312 _ bp Cal. 107 ; Dai Biel ac. v. Meso bivl} dx . 34 _. ANG F.2d le OS (1 Cir. 3000) . __Uoiied Parcel Sens “nc v. FlovesGalavza ws... 33 | ; 2 FE.)