No. 20-8064

Derrick Grant v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: assault assault-statute criminal-law federal-agency federal-officer-employee federal-state-balance prison-employee statutory-construction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-06-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a private prison employee assisting federal marshals is covered under 18 U.S.C. § 1114

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Section 111 of Title 18 of the United States Code prohibits assaulting any person “designated in section 1114 of this title.” Section § 1114 designates “any officer or employee of the United States or of any agency of the United States Government... ot any person assisting such an officer ot employee in the performance of such duties” as qualifying. Hete, the defendant punched an employee of a company that operates a private prison and was convicted of assault under 18 U.S.C. § 111. The courts below identified no officer or employee being assisted. Instead, the courts found that that the private employee was assisting the Marshals Service, a fedetal agency. But an “agency” is not “an officer or employee.” Was the private prison’s employee “assisting such an officer or employee” such that the employee was a covered person under § 1114? (ii)

Docket Entries

2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2021)

Attorneys

Derrick Grant
Anna GreveTaft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Petitioner
Anna GreveTaft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent