Whether the district court and appeals court abused their discretion in concluding that the defendant would be a danger to the community

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Ded Ha dati wach ond appeals Court abuse (ts diseredven | iM velyrity on Vefertants Stule puventlhe wruretidas when sf | boncluded! that Beterwlint roulel be aw danger tv the community 7 2. Diol the disdact out abuse its Lisere tion ard fre applals Cod by falling bo wustler all of Geftnctunts Personal | _ | Chovacter rs ties, raclading hrs yued/ca | lWouds*tivas wher 17 . pomttbesten wncuded thut Ass cond tro bere, Hots , (lends, Sethe. SeOVWE_ ty Lomrunrt Uo Ppassfronute release, ; Jeals abuse +t drseretrn | 3 Dred Une. dvsteret court und court of oF dank veosring AN awkle by failed to unsrder Deveaclun ie Ww “4 (dose) would have been comares th promote respect moni vor falta Wired of fre Oetonr vv ; public fom Ty = Lor He low « :