No. 20-8079
Kevin L. Martin v. Kenneth P. Cotter, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's claim of equal protection under the law
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. _& thether Couscte va Apges | depgtive [Ceycn wictin oF £quea|gacttety en oF baw u this they juatsdtetten by Arése te grant meter fe eeatee!s ja femme peupetts 2. whether th count of Appeal abise of plsextte5 . by de ptive mexrtin withra they Jutisduahe A gue [ : gantecteo Acgh L . 3. whether the plstract court nbuse f_visctetter by AALASE #& pote de A (afunchve AeltcE bhbkcouse meta LG See(eras the te sh Arsutt +e challenge his cenvic fies. | | . |
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent Kenneth Cotter, et al. to respond filed.
2021-04-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2021)
Attorneys
Kenneth Cotter, et al.
Aaron Thomas Craft — Office of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent
Aaron Thomas Craft — Office of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent