Does the petitioner deserve another trial based upon constitutional rights violations?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) DOES THE PETITIONER DESERVE ANOTHER TRIAL BASED UPON CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS? ANSWER: YES y 2) DOES THE PETITIONER CLAIM HIS TOTAL INNOCENCE BASED UPON DNA EVIDENCE FOR EXONERATION PURPOSES? ANSWER: YES 3) DID PETITIONER REQUEST LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION INTO FEDERAL CRIMES BEING COMMITTED? ANSWER: YES 4) WAS BLOOD SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THE CRIME SCENE FOR DNA , IDENTIFICATION OR OTHER INVESTIGATORY METHODS? , . ANSWER: NO 5) DOES THE HAVE SUCH RIGHT TO SUCH DNA SAMPLES FOR EXONERATION PURPOSES IN CLAIMS OF HIS INNOCENCE? : ANSWER: YES” : 6) ARE THERE FORGED AND FALSIFIED RECORDS AND/OR INFORMATION BEFORE THE COURTS TO FALSIFY A CONVICTION WRONGFULLY? ANSWER: YES 7) DOES THE PETITIONER THINK IN THE FOREFRONT THAT SECTION 3521 OF TITLE 18 U.S.C.§ IS BEING USED TO COMMIT CRIMES AGAINST THE PETITIONER? ANSWER: YES . 8) WAS THERE A VIOLATION OF THE MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AG AND THE PERSON BEING PROTECTED? ANSWER: YES 9) SHOULD THERE BE AN EXHUMATION OF THE ALLEGED DEAD CORPSE OF. PETITIONER'S WIFE,WHOM HE CLAIMS IS STILL ALIVE AND WELL? ANSWER: TOTALLY YES (i) I 4 . : . 10) DOES THE PETITIONER HAVE THE RIGHT TO PRESENT PROOF BY ‘ DEFENSE WITNESSES AND LEGAL DOCUMENTATION? . ANSWER: YES . 11) DID THE TRIAL COURT COMMENCE SUCH PLAIN ERROR IN SUCH CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS NOT ALLOWING THE PETITIONER NOT ‘ GETTING A "FAIR AND IMPARTIAL" TRIAL UNDER THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS? . | ANSWER: TOTALLY YES 12) WAS THERE A "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE" INVOLVED" ANSWER: YES . ; 13) WAS THERE SUCH "CAUSE AND PREJUDICE"TOTALLY INVOLVED? . ANSWER: YES : ; . . : . 14) DID PETITIONER SEE HIS ALLEGED DEAD WIFE UPFRONT AT SCI. HOUTZDALE,AND FACE TO FACE ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS? : ANSWER: YES : : : : 15) DOES THE PETITIONER DESERVE SUCH GRANTING OF A GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION INTO SUCH CRIMES AGAINST HIM? ANSWER: YES 16) IS THE PETITIONER FALSELY IMPRISONED UNDER FALSIFIED RECORDS AND INFORMATION: AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS? . . ANSWER: YES 17) ARE STATE AND FEDERAL OFFICIALS INVOLVED IN THIS CASE, AT HAND? , , ANSWER: YES 18) DOES THE PETITIONER DESERVE A REMEDY FROM THIS HONORABLE COURT FOR SUCH VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS? ANSWER: YES (ii) : 19) DOES THE PETITIONER HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL OR AN ATTORNEY? ANSWER: YES 20) DOES THE PETITIONER HAVE. THE RIGHT TO CHOSE HIS OWN COUNSEL OR AN ATTORNEY OF CHOICE? ANSWER: YES . 21) DID SUCH ATTORNEY OR COUNSEL APPOINTED BY. THE COURT ABANDONED THE PETITIONER? ANSWER: YES . 22) IS THERE MUCH REASONABLE DOUBT IN PETITIONERS CASE? ; ANSWER: YES ) 23) WAS THERE ALOT REASONABLE DOUBT FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE END OF PETITIONERS CASE,AT HAND? ANSWER: YES a 24) WAS EVIDENCE EXEMPTED FROM THE CRIME SCENE? ANSWER: YES 25) WAS ANY EVIDENCE COLLECTED FROM THE CRIME SCENE? ANSWER: , No. ‘ c : : ; , (iii) oe .