William Edward Erickson v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Privacy
Whether the petitioner is entitled to constitutional review and relief on his claims at the appeal level regarding his ineffective assistance of counsel, including claims of involuntary plea, coercion by attorney, use of evidence not adjudicated in court, and use of extraneous statements in violation of law
Questions Presented A) 5 petitioner entitled to a. consttutional review gd hid courh on his presented “elains at +he appeal level regarding his Zreechve Assistars ce of counse/, for farthing 42 eject under the Sixth Amendment ES the United Sta Censttution. te: 3) Inveluntary plea , dain attorney Coercion ; b) use of evidence not ad judi tated mH court; (2) use of extraneous Statements fn viclaton sf avticlesS on law}; 2Q)ts petitioner entitled to a consthelional reviews and arant of habeas relief due fo destruction of eNidence prior to tanclusion of inrthal appeal ; 3) will the chairt of saknowing and intelligent Warwer be atlowed due to Vicleton of Feder Rules aS to the capacihy of the petitioner; i\) pid the Trial Court abuse diserebion tn Violating | Fedevel Rules &f Crininal Procedure at aAanonishment on 9 wrthdrausal of plea claier referring lorck 4o the evidence. presented try ExArerrs? — . (i) Questions Nor ADURECATED (Spee ICALLY) AT COA 5) was counsel theffective at punishment hearing for Failing do object te nyeluntars plea tn absense of rehigat RA Ayraunstances (¢lairet A(C petition for habeas relief) , () was tounsel ineffective, fr not objecting +o extraNeous conduct not ad Judi cated in court, (olan AYR) petition for habeas relief) . 1) was Coun sel ineffective far faih'ng to object bes abuse of ctiseretion of the trial court iw allowtn: exyryan<ous stakertents of Vichy | Auardian , or paakyves in jected in yiolakon of constiticional and Satutorsy elas. Celate 1(a) petrhen for habeas relic#) 3) 125 counsel wnefective for not object ste the havred use of mitigating tnformaetom for 2 vedétermination of sentence which would constitute, abuse. of diseredion « (claim 1(b) pettion for habeas relef) | Questions presented) (1), (A List of Parhes (11) , Related caees iit