No. 20-809
Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson, et al.
Tags: ballot-inspection civil-rights due-process election electoral-college electoral-count-act fourteenth-amendment presidential-electors standing state-courts voting-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Electoral Count Act impose unconstitutional deadlines on state courts' final determination of disputes over presidential electors?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Does the Electoral Count Act (inclusive of 3 U.S.C. § 5, the “safe harbor” statute) impose unconstitutional deadlines on state courts’ final determination of disputes over presidential electors? II. Was Petitioner denied due process under the Fourteenth Amendment, where because of the “deadlines” found in the Electoral Count Act (inclusive of 3 U.S.C. §§ 5, 7), the trial court allowed only two days to discover and inspect the ballots in a race in which over three million votes were cast? i
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-11
Motion to expedite consideration filed by petitioner DENIED.
2020-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2021)
2020-12-11
Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioner.
Attorneys
Kelli Ward
John Douglas Wilenchik — Wilenchik & Bartness, P.C., Petitioner