Where there is ambiguity as to which penalty applies in a multi-object conspiracy that is a covered offense pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, does the Rule of Lenity require the court to impose the less strict of the two penalties?

No question identified. : ~ and_a_copy of the Motion for_beave to Proceed _]To_Rema Pauperis_in the above -styled case,and lacopy of this Certificate of ia Cectified mail Mo, 7ol3 1210 000).3424 6118, postnge pre-paid, to te Clerk, Supreme Couctof the loited Stotes, ulashington, DL. 20843, the Solicitor General of the United States , Room Sblb , Departs jment.ot Justice , 950 Penosylvania Aver, N.W., Billy Toe McDade, 100 N.E. Monroe steeet, Moria, ILL —}61b02.,and_the Asst. United States Attocney foc tha all pacties required to be served have been __ Served, S| (gohvbo | CU | FCC, USP 4 Coleman Coleman, ELL 33521 = Que stio a@Resented = 4. Where there is_ambiquity as to which penalty . applies in a multi -object Conspiracy that is.q , covered offense.” pursuant to the Ficst Step Act } of 2018, dloes the Rule of Lenity cequice the couch __ fo_impose the less strict of the tuto penalties, pT = ist of Sctes 1 United States vy, Johnson, Ma. i0T-cc-l0044, LS. District Court foc the Ceatral bisteict of ___| Litineis, Pacia Division. Judgement entered 4.United States v. Johnson, No. Z0-I749, U. 5. Couct of Appeals fac the. Seventh Circuit, > Petition far_ceheacing and ceheacing en: banes. _ — Judgement eateced January b, 2021, ee Cocporate Disclosure Statement _ lo in the a outcome of the present mottec, ae List_of Proceedings Corey Sohnson__v. United States, United Stakes — LSupceme Court, Case No TBA, —4.nited States_v.Cocey Johnsen, 2020 tsS, _ |App. LExTs_ 3842 ,Case No. 20-1749. United ___ States Ciccuit Couct of Appeals for she Se ygetth Cnssih, foal Solynenh trhead DEG ne 5), po — _ 7 |