Mohammad Sohail Saleem v. Mark Garman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration Privacy
Did the United States Court of Appeals, for the Third District err in denying Mr. Saleem's Petition for Re-Hearing
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 7 , I. Did the United States Court of Appeals, for the Third District err in denying Mr. Saleem's Petition for Re-Hearing, when such an abuse of -discretion when it involves the results of partiality, prejudice, bias or ill-will, as shown by the evidence of the records. . Proposed Answer in The Positive II. Did the United States Court of Appeals, fop the Third Circuit, err in denying Mr. Saleem,s Motion for Re-Hearing, when such denial is direct violation of Due Process Rights and Violation of his Constitutional rights of the United States and Pennsylvania, and such relief is available because the Exception is Inapplicable. Proposed Answer in The Positive ‘ a . | j oo t 3