No. 20-8098

Mohammad Sohail Saleem v. Mark Garman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review bias civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-bias partiality petition-for-rehearing prejudice
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the United States Court of Appeals, for the Third District err in denying Mr. Saleem's Petition for Re-Hearing

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 7 , I. Did the United States Court of Appeals, for the Third District err in denying Mr. Saleem's Petition for Re-Hearing, when such an abuse of -discretion when it involves the results of partiality, prejudice, bias or ill-will, as shown by the evidence of the records. . Proposed Answer in The Positive II. Did the United States Court of Appeals, fop the Third Circuit, err in denying Mr. Saleem,s Motion for Re-Hearing, when such denial is direct violation of Due Process Rights and Violation of his Constitutional rights of the United States and Pennsylvania, and such relief is available because the Exception is Inapplicable. Proposed Answer in The Positive ‘ a . | j oo t 3

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 23, 2021)

Attorneys

Mohammad Sohail Saleem
Mohammad Sohail Saleem — Petitioner
Mohammad Sohail Saleem — Petitioner