Did the Florida Department of Corrections award Mr. McGill approximately 4,148 days of gain-time before changing their interpretation of s.944.275 of the Florida Statutes, and does this constitute a due-process-violation, ex-post-facto-clause-violation, and equal-protection-clause-violation?

No question identified. : _ J EQ (CA) Did the Florida Department of Corcechions award Me. McGil oapptoximately 4148 days of qaiosbiee . peboce changing their inkecpretation of s.G44.275 a __IFlowid oStahubes Gaaud,andtockesbing the easmed—— er eds. Ce Suhr gy AM Lo ae cee ee ce cet ee (o_o Rae Process_violation toc not follomsna dHoejc . — CS a wiolation_ok the Ex Posh Facko Clouse of dhe Fourteenth Aimendereot where the Depackment's changed —_—__ en pokecoretation of the gainetine law was applied — celcoactine to the detriment of Me MeGiIy amd (co Due Process siolotion for Faking to qive Me MeGsi = psiocoolice of the fo Pebuce ando tearing in wlinicl, _ ——_he_could_Ocesent @ (2 Does the Deoarhment's cussent inherocebabion of 8.944.215... Flocida Statules C99), violate the [Equal , ooeclian Clause of the Fouckeentn Amendment Ghee ih_does_nok biclher a competing qovecoment interest por is ik ceasonably celated to a_qowecoment inbeces}?