Whether the government's seizure of private property without just compensation violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Frwne ated i a aa ne Pee =A <2€ tet ee EY, CAs Yin hos HOT eee onegeiing La onek en ei artes ZZ. Z s Ac Gtsy, A flare Pin rete Dag Cee nee. RB F< Ape Cnelinens 2 Pogeins Rome, Ri fee peor 02 A Vos he sccleect gta Kanter, blhors Cu leypags acs <oon Come ne flee 1p Be Cenc 2 2 e Freer a7 alec Vf" aa ar gee Vom MeanctiK6,, ze (224 . “<2 ASHag2OWP Soe: Cteextcattys oF 2-7 xu: ; eg te tg UE Rie wCeecacere cf. a prorks ; anes Pore on. eller lz, Kescee tay Kenic Restcies, 24, »_ 5; ' A etree Ol A erage Biore Zi O88 tap 09% <2 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED Pipe DPF Gee Lbs, GO CSag-Whe CL, f. O.B, G. 7 Pree 2. * De (a7 Beeerreiomaniue Le Ca. Boer Loin A ZT, see Pee csedm of DC KRU PSP epee OG 2esece » be, SO ORE ia Ai Bree 9>(E) Mere? <_ ebateey, 0 Cote Sa. LS tr Ze Green Fee Doz Z Fi Cag RM in Bae en ee! Z MH Scemen, Zp 2 WEL 9 Pore tteite Las FES. OG a or eh Peston ot 2B al ee,