Taariq Kaaleeq Jackson-Bey v. United States
Immigration
Whether the petitioner's guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) was not knowingly and intelligently made because he was not informed that an element of the offense was that he belonged to a class of persons barred from possessing a firearm
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED tM Lohethes Ta Light of Rehai€v United States,139S.cr 2041 (2,En Accord sith United States v. Gory 454 E3414 Gish cir ded8) Rebilion for Certiorer Granted No. 30-HHH,The Pebiioness Guilty Pleo Te Possession of A Fiteaten Gy A _ Convicted Felon 18 U6e $493.34, LSas Nor Knowingly And Tatelligentty mode, Because He Was. Nor Tafotmed Tnat An Eleenent OF The, Offense. Was That He _Belanged To A Class of Persons Barred Foam Rossesting A Fireaton As Reguited _ By Fed. 0. Con. PALLDLILEY, And AS Suche, Ts The District Coucts Eeror Tn Accepting i is Lnintalligent Guilty Plea A Struct Exrov Because Tk InfFringed UPon Wis _ Autonomy Tatetest In Maing His Ginn Choices About Tre Proper Way To tL Blthere. A Guilty Plea Ts. Nok Conshitutionally Valid Because Tre Defendante _ Did not Receive Real Notice oF The Nakate Of The Charge Agsinst Hien Did Tre ___ A lpallake Couck Below Comenit Error Tn Relying Upon The Appeal Wanver To Benya Revieus En The Fisst Tastance|cr Henderson v. United States SH81S.966, —_ 68133 scr 191,185 Led.2A 89 (2019) [Potts laid By The. Fouutth Ciccuit Tin sited States v. Gacy 454 FA 144 ad 2023) —-_feeabie eee a ae ee acteecach tena’ ante taana Behton ne rei _This court caer To Detomine That The Walling Tn Gacy itas The. Correct Ruling, _ __ Shoulda This Courk Consistent Usith Administration of Justice With An Evenhand, _{Allouo The. Tastant Petitioner Oreceducaily Peshared, On Direct Appeal, A Finst Toshance. pete » Tin Accard With The Rule of Law Therein 2CF Hankersonv-North ——fainasna as oss an __ _— Ss EE Zi '