No. 20-8116
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure evidence evidence-admissibility federal-rule-of-evidence-404(b) federal-rules-of-evidence judicial-discretion legal-interpretation rule-of-exclusion rule-of-inclusion
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) a rule of inclusion or exclusion?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) permits the admission of evidence of any other crime, wrong or act to prove a criminal defendant’s motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident. The Second, Eighth, Ninth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits characterize this as a rule of inclusion, and as a result, other-acts evidence is routinely admitted. The Third, Fourth, and Seventh Circuits, however, reason that Rule 404(b) is a general rule of exclusion, meaning that it confers no presumption of admissibility. Is Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) a rule of inclusion or exclusion? 1
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-05-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent