Whether an attorney's failure to advise a client of the adverse ramifications of raising certain claims on direct appeal constitutes a substantial denial of a constitutional right

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW . . _ As a matter of first impression in this court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 10(C), does . an attomey’s failure to advise his client of the adverse ramifications of raising any claims of TAC oo, ; on direct appeal constitute the substantial denial of a constitutional tight, debatable among jurist : oe of reasons, as contemplated by this court’s decision in Slack v. MeDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000), particularly when the district court failed to conduct an evidentiary. hearing to resolve the issue, where petitioner had material evidence showing that his attorney never consulted with him, in . , “that regard? 7 . Se , . oo: : Does the Seventh Circuit’s denial of Miller’s request for a COA, grounded in Miller’s "contentions that the prosecution failed tu timely discluse its use of fabricated evidente in search <= , . and arrest warrants, constitute an issue debatable among jurist of reason, pursuant to Slack v. McDaniels, the substantial denial of a constitutional right, and most importantly, does this ; ; decision conflict with this court’s decision in Brady v. Maryland, 373 US, 83, so as to warrant . . ; the grant of certiorari by this court under Supreme Court Rule 10(C)? . . , : Does the Seventh circuit’s denial of Miller’s request for a Certificate of Appealability on , , two separate pre-trial, 4" and 5 Amendment, IAC issues—one citing Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (1975) and the other, Franks v. Delaware, 438 US. 154 (1978)—constitute decisions debatable among jurist of reason, pursuant to Slack v. McDaniel, and moreover, substantially , conflict with this court’s decisions in Kimmelman v. Morrision, 477 U.S. 365 (1986), so as to a . . ‘warrant the grant of certiorari by this court under Supreme Court Rule 10(c), particularly when : the information utilized in the search and arrest warrants were derived from undisclosed, . . ; fabricated information and evidence in violation of Brady? ; ; , : ee “+ LISTOF PARTIES a ee oO, . [k] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the.cover page. . ; ; , f] An parties do not appear in the caption of the case ori the cover page. A list of : : all