Whether the state courts erred and abused their discretion by depriving and denying the defendant of his statutory rights to DNA testing

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE STATE COURTS ERRED AND ABUSED THEIR DISCRETION BY DEPRIVING AND DENYING THE DEFENDANT OF HIS STATUTORY RIGHTS TO DNA TESTING TO A CHARGE:OF FIRST DEGREE SEXUAL ASSAULT WHEN THE STATE COURTS USES DEFENDANT'S NO CONTEST PLEA AGAINST DEFENDANT TO «= °°. DENIED THE DEFENDANT DNA TESTING PER FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTION. II. WHETHER THE STATE COURTS ERRED AND ABUSED THEIR DISCRETION TO DENY [Aa] DEFENDANT TO DNA TESTING ON EXISTING DNA EVIDENCE THATS BEEN CONCEALED AND HINDERED FROM DEFENSE SINCE 2008. PER THE FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTION. III. WHETHER THE STATE COURTS CAUSED INFRINGEMENT TOWARD THE DEFENDANT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS CLAUSE UNDER THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS OF THE FEDERAL AND STATE CONSITUTION TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OF AMERICA TO ARTICLE I, SECTION 3 OF THE NEBRASKA CONSTITUTION. . PER FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTION. . VIII