Tamara Rouhi v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Securities Immigration
There has been no redress of my grievance
ISSUES PRESENTED 1. There has been no redress of my grievance. 2. The Defendants did not make a single valid point, but still prevailed in the case. That is unjust. 3. My rights were violated by Federal District Court of Maryland and the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 4. I'd like the previously mentioned injustices to be corrected. Il. PARTIES Plaintiff/Appellant Tamara Rouhi 125 Fennington Circle Owings Mills MD 21117 The Defendant -* Represented by =. Comeast wo Attorney ce Management Adam $ Caldwell Comcast Center “Davis Write Tremaine LLP / 1701 John F Kennedy Blvd 1919 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Ste 800. <.. Philadelphia, PA 19103-2838 "Washington, DC 20006 J. a ' : Ill. PREVIOUS PROCEEDINGS The Original case (Tamara Rouhi V Comcast, Case #19CV703) was filed at the United States District Court, District of Maryland, Baltimore, on 3/6/19. Judgment granting the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was entered on 11/27/19. Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration was denied on 8/14/20. An Appeal was filed at the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Tamara Rouhi V Comcast, Case #20-1462), and “judgement” by a clerk was entered on 12/21/20 and 1/12/21. L|