No. 20-8151

Marcus D. Williams v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-05-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-evidence criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admissibility forensic-evidence forensic-testing hearsay hearsay-evidence testimonial-statement testimonial-statements
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What degree of formality is necessary before hearsay statements contained within a forensic testing report which connect an accused to the testing results are considered 'testimonial'?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW. _ 1. What degree of formality is necessary before hearsay statements contained within a forensic testing report which connect an accused to the testing _ kesults are considered "testimonial"? EEE EEE fn ee

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-05-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Marcus D. Williams
Marcus D. Williams — Petitioner
Marcus D. Williams — Petitioner