No. 20-8153

Samantha J. Jackson v. AT&T Retirement Savings Plan, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-court civil-procedure docketing excusable-neglect filing-deadline jurisdictional-issue notice-of-appeal pro-se pro-se-filer
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Appellate Court erroneously calculate the filing deadline for the Notice of Appeal?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Question 1: Did the Appellate Court erroneously calculate the filing deadline for the Notice of Appeal as January 21, 2021 instead of January 25, 2021 when it neglected to add the additional 3 day allowance for the Pro Se filer to file? Question 2: Did the Appellate Court err in their decision when they failed to consider that the notice of judgement was received after January 21, 2021? Should excusable neglect have been allowed under this circumstance? Question 3: Did the Appellate court erroneously state that the date the notice of appeal was docketed was the date it was filed when they composing the Order?

Docket Entries

2022-02-03
Case considered closed.
2021-10-04
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 25, 2021, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2021-07-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-29
Waiver of right of respondent AT&T Retirement Savings Plan, et al. to respond filed.
2021-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 28, 2021)

Attorneys

AT&T Retirement Savings Plan, et al.
Wesley Earl StockardLittler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent
Wesley Earl StockardLittler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent
Samantha Jackson
Samantha J. Jackson — Petitioner
Samantha J. Jackson — Petitioner