Whether the right of meaningful access to the courts authorizes certain courts to disregard indigent party requests for available court resources where that disregard is in conflict with existing constitutional law

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : PURSUANT FEDERAL (AND STATE) CONSTITVTION OVE PRocess/ PETITION GUARANTEES ON THE RIGHT 0€ “MEANING FUL” ACCESS TO THE COVATS : , (1) OM NENFRIVOLOUS AeT/ONS, DOES THE RIGHT of MEANING EVEL ‘NeeeLs TO TUE COURTS AVTHORIZE CERTAIN COURTS TO DISREGARD INDIGENT PARTY REQUESTS FOR AVALLABLE COURT RESOURCES WHERE THAT DISRECARD IS IN Comfeier PITH EXISTING CONSTITUTIONAL LAN ESTABLISHING THAT : COURTS ARE TO AFPLI DISCRETIONARY REVIEW NoT ONLY TO REQVESTS FoR CoURT RESOVR CES BYT TO SATISEY THE } REGY/REMENT ON THE SUES TION / RIGHT TO MEANINGEUL Acc€sSS s OR (2) if THE RIGHT 6F MEANINGFUL ACCESS SATISFIED AT THE LIANITING OF NOM FRIVOLOUS PAPERS BEING FicED ; Ano/ eR (3) 18 THE RIGHT 66 MEANINEESL ACCESS TO AVAILABLE COURT RErouvhces/TOoLs APPLY TR THE WEALTHY AND NOT T° THE INDIGENT Acl0/ OR (APRISONED ,