No. 20-8172
Jorge Antonio Perez, aka Steven Mark Hamm v. Gavin Newsom, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-due-process constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-court federal-sentencing free-speech judicial-interpretation prior-conviction-doctrine standing state-secrets-doctrine
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the circuit court erred in ruling against the petitioner and finding violations of the state-secrets-doctrine
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ls THE Cr SERCUIT~ Coyvrtr WRo AGP wed THEY WRONG cutly Rule! inst YO. o rd Vi0laTLoNs OF THE? [“Srare Dects1s Doctrine” ] MAND, ALSO TS THE CiRevrtr CovRT WRoNG By STATING tN WRitiNG THAT THE MURDERS oF Latte G2rRis atvoLlous’? TS FRE ‘ .
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 28, 2021)
Attorneys
Jorge A. Perez
Jorge A. Perez — Petitioner