Whether virtual currency is property under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, and whether seizure of virtual currency without due process of law violates constitutional rights

No question identified. : sessions Preserved \) Su the VUnted Srokes Department & Treasury WS debined Virtual Corrency oS DWeavehu™ He Tax Wv ess, When vrerdal Gu (reacy oelonas So A can of tee Unded Steaks, oes Virtual Currency, Jemnad th Some DRoyperry BORAS AG definad WW the LoseAhy oth and Coscheantn amendnaet of hehe US Gast tis, and Wasld sezurcol Vortual Coreen Warosh OO Wosfort of Weov”_mole Coyse, and wihost Doe Process o& Lad Ganskcure aq Vhatton st CanstrtuTisnal Crants, ZVVses an rnvakd (false dede w che “Ture” ob | a Crovovle couse allesd okKdavd , Fork +o secure & Valid Sologccrorien to Oa&h of Nefvemakion, ond fark to avihoty@e the docu rend te WecomMe w Probable cavyoe oKidauh by defacto as Rqurwed by Law. Consrtvte af Dow Reacesd & Loss Kolakioa. La Vielatten af Qh, add Goolreerth amend mats U.S. Conservtwrier, alloudina Gor Fedecal cevre UnNieh ZR UVSC S225,