No. 20-8191
Steven E. Hill v. C. V. Rivera, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: article-i-courts due-process judicial-jurisdiction jurisdictional-status limited-jurisdiction military-tribunals reconsideration supreme-court-review united-states-v-briggs
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-06-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the status of military tribunals as Article I courts of special limited jurisdiction warrants reconsideration of United States v. Briggs
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether this Court’s decision in United States v. Briggs 592 U.S. ___, 141 S. Ct. 467 (December 10, 2020) should be reconsidered in light of the status of military tribunals as Article I courts of special limited jurisdiction. ii
Docket Entries
2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-04
Waiver of right of respondent C.V. Rivera to respond filed.
2021-03-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 2, 2021)
Attorneys
C.V. Rivera
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Steven Hill
Jeremy B. Lowrey — Jeremy B Lowrey, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Jeremy B. Lowrey — Jeremy B Lowrey, Attorney at Law, Petitioner