Whether the petitioner's due process and equal protection rights were violated by the denial of his habeas corpus petition without explanation

No question identified. : z, Fate art eet aE i OR ata And -lhe/ pelle Court deni my case, alon with ointment of Counse| deme peth fented oe fone: day “ta the Bact know thet, by 1 my ae cing indige ey Violdfed m amendme hk Te due process Sand equal protection r eth seen Geek ARES. aoa, &, M A eal State ext Som de jal Federal abea Cor “u ive find ere ee (Fro en aa more merits onl f) ive . © “in about’ The “pre yinger witness Stan was net even denied + in. Habeas rpud; bul, all-“aix clat ere deny T. ea. ou any ex planet ton of why ? Rehearing yet algo, no Leplanation! 3, Wh Lid m old law er (Bor Mi; strial and Deuble See acd Teal} Attorney Bl kare Kn, herd my nt cade (ath nolelp) we so l ena e a e orne ric Dutpam ) and 5 a TiAl ; Atbecnly ‘Klein Crow, a witness by Kidge Macy Brostahan) wag ano show? di orne| —Dunha to) Inq o b oe ‘an of othe 4, Why ded Aftrngy Bitton oe Selete de Novemble of 2510 fe te prove my innocence ?P Judge-DBregnahan approves afl my w ned eS, 5, 0 itness Sh 4d both cops, at both ialg Mis rial and Nov. 4010 ial bey aati “steies cn Ae Sat iat ct fal 5 e Tatctal 5 (an eth in Tranderi > W wa \ te ‘enough fe get my va Che ree a or) ic? te thal 2 . &, h GQ my other our elai Tn A eal IA claims in Habeas Corpus) Wh, mera. Siac cyidpree iV ME riers: my Ee oh Weert, ABOU Bu Copten «Qe abafeneeh he present over tt flovegber 20\0 nay Vi hen DVD, shown eqa 5a again. (D 7 edica G) Dobe mA Assistant Medidrl Examiner Nancy Sones Amidst *"Seahdal . | — H.