Whether the government's seizure of private property without just compensation violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment

ESTIONS PRESENTED leo WHETNER DEFENDANTS RECENED TREFFECT WE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL DURING SENTENCING TW WICK COUNSEL FAILED JO BRIEF OA® PRESERVE THE SUPREME CouRT’S RULING ENUNICATED SN ALLEYNE V. UNITED STATES, Wiha RESULTED TN AN ERRONEOUS TNCREASE IN TRE MANDATORY KNIMOMm SENTENCED, WITHOUT THE REQUISITE SURY'S FINDING ¢ 2. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COoRT COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR WHEN XY EMGosED A LIFE SENTENCE TO DEFENDANTS) a, TN VIOUCATION OF THE SUPREME COURT’S RULING TN ALLEYNE V+ UNITED STATES 2 3. WHETRER THE DISTRICT COORT ERRED BY A PRE PANDERAMCE OF THE EVIDENCE STANDARD TA Flip PEFENDANT CS) . RESPONSIBLE FoR A DRUG TYPE AND QUANTITY NOT SUBNITED TQ OR FOUND BY THE SURY, EN VIOLATION OF THE RULE ANNOUNCED SN ALLEYNE ©