No. 20-8219

Clark D. Young v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conflict-of-interest counsel-failure criminal-history due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the defendant was deprived of his Sixth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights when counsel failed to investigate his criminal history

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QuesTron(s) PRESENTED () WAS the defendant deprived of his sixth, Fifth, and Fourteenth amendments , when Counsel fAiled to investigate his. Criminal history? (2 was the defendant cleprived of bis Sixth and Feurteent, amendments when Counse)\ faileel to Speake U9 when the Clefendant Was giving a inonsisknt and Wcovwweck Serttence > ‘@)Is + Considered & Confitct of Interest when a prosecutwy fy the UsSWas a district Athorney against the defendant, in Te of the enhancements vsed against hin trom his pris 2 & Wlos it a Breach of Conhacdt on behalf of the government ty disregarcl and Lqnove the de¥endants InetEckve Mssishince of Comsel Claims 2 @Qon a National Seale, what determines suffictent perk ethic for a ans yer" TO b@ Considered effective and Ade gubte , 25 the Constitution requires? —

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2021)

Attorneys

Clark D. Young
Clark D. Young — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent