No. 20-8221

Terrence Lavaron Thomas v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2021-06-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-defense due-process ineffective-assistance plea-withdrawal right-to-counsel right-to-speedy-trial sentencing sentencing-error speedy-trial
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was defense counsel ineffective in failing to contest the sufficiency of evidence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Argument I Was Defense counsel ineffective in failing to contest the sufficiency of evidence against Mr. Thomas, as he was charged with assault with a dangerous weapon against Mr. Shackleford? ; Argument I ’ Was Defense counsel ineffective for refusing to address Mr. Thomas repeated request to withdraw his plea before sentencing? Argument DiI Was Defendant’s Due process rights of the United States Constitution violated, where he was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information? Argument IV : . Was Defendant’s right to a preliminary examination within 14 days a violated under the : United States Constitution? Argument V Was Defendant’s Constitutional right to a speedy trial and to a speedy resolution of all matters violated? 4

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2021)

Attorneys

Terrence Lavaron Thomas
Terrence Lavaron Thomas — Petitioner