Terrence Lavaron Thomas v. Michigan
DueProcess Privacy
Was defense counsel ineffective in failing to contest the sufficiency of evidence?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Argument I Was Defense counsel ineffective in failing to contest the sufficiency of evidence against Mr. Thomas, as he was charged with assault with a dangerous weapon against Mr. Shackleford? ; Argument I ’ Was Defense counsel ineffective for refusing to address Mr. Thomas repeated request to withdraw his plea before sentencing? Argument DiI Was Defendant’s Due process rights of the United States Constitution violated, where he was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information? Argument IV : . Was Defendant’s right to a preliminary examination within 14 days a violated under the : United States Constitution? Argument V Was Defendant’s Constitutional right to a speedy trial and to a speedy resolution of all matters violated? 4