Whether the State District Court can convict the petitioner without 'paid' counsel of choice at pre-trial, plea, arraignment, and evidentiary hearings, with a court-appointed 'stand-in' attorney that coerced the petitioner to sign a waiver, yet the petitioner pleaded 'Not Guilty' requesting trial

No question identified. : Questions Pesented . Canthe State District Court convict petitioner ) with-out “paid” counsel of choice. at; pre-trial, plea, arraignment, and evidentiary hearings, With a outside. attorney (stand-in) that coerced Bridges to sign waver, yet petitioner plead “Not Guilty" requesting trial? When trial counsel Tohn Heather. is Informed about petitioner's “not guilty" plea, he becomes “hostile” and challenges Bridges then abandons case and refuses te present the facts at trial Ne investigation er affidavits, is this effective counsel, Heath emitted critical medical evidence {"no-trama" at exampand omitted report by the District Attorney at trial , counsel twould only falk about a “plea agreement", Can a breached contract at trial (state) be consitered unconstitutional {Comsel’s Coatrat uxth petitioner iSbroken? when ‘net presert” pericentract. Aleo, counsel signed "State's Exhibit" at sertencin G that 1s void able decumert ef record. Heath signe| he] WAS present ot arraignment hearing j this (statement (stalse]. When a Stele Criminal Thal (es held with-oeet paid counsel present “incourt" this must be. ‘abuse. ef Aiscretion" by the trial court net erstectiine the. pefujener’s conetiticienal ciahts therein, preall achons VoIAs Petitioner is diligent after trial, files vaatSies rections, and ae "Anders Reick” and teraminates Heath as counsel, j Bridges tiles (tate) out-of tine. DNA appeal that 1s geacted, then converted Via, Deder te Direct Reviews| Tex Code Coat, Proc. art. LOST; 2.04] {DNA's are. CA.DS article & for counsel, I ~ yet direct review fs denied, and everlecks constitthenal errors at trial; can this be. allowed? . Bridges moves to Petilion fer Discretionary Reviets and acts a vacated, reversed and cemaid pres that apprints counsel Jchn Reeves who jeins with District Attorney at Jetat mehen abandenin Bridges lesue's | at appeals is this standacd for appellate counsel [te file] wrth State's Atforney and emitts any add feral evidence, order? | Can the violations of Beidges' constiubenal amendments upon the fourth; fifth j sith 4 and fourteenth Amdts be allewed by the. Uncted States Courts, ivrth-cut a review of the State's eccors & prejudice and harm, The United States Dietrich Court refused or omiHed the. slates out-of fine appeal,isthis abuse of Aiseretion, when the order's are. iin the recerd at Federal bk Ges, of Antitecroriam and Effective Death Penalty Actot 19%. Upeact,) Can the US District Couch refuse. record request at shew cause erdec or cerensel’s summen's tole atticlavt, or evecleck constitictlenal violations wrthin the records submitted by the Sate? Did the Uncted States Court ef Appeals Filth Gicwt hold a “threashold Inguiry", SEE: (70(b) Motion pending th the US District Lourt Eastern District Lufkin Division, holding uether review. |