No. 20-8228
John Campbell v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal armed-bank-robbery bank-robbery count-severance criminal-procedure evidence evidence-suppression firearm-possession jury-instructions sentencing sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court incorrectly decline to charge the jury on a key element of armed bank robbery?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Did the district court incorrectly decline to charge the jury on a key element of armed bank robbery? 2. Did the district court err in denying suppression of physical evidence? 3. Did the district court err in failing to dismiss the charge of possession of a firearm during a bank robbery? 4. Did the district court improperly enhance Mr. Campbell’s sentence? 5. Did the district court err in refusing to sever counts? 4
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent The United States of America to respond filed.
2021-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2021)
Attorneys
The United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent