No. 20-8234
Arian Lamont Brown v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-criminal-guideline criminal-procedure en-banc en-banc-review judicial-discretion mandate mandate-recall precedent sentence-enhancement sentencing sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit abuse its discretion and err by denying the Motion to Recall the Mandate
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit abuse its discretion and err by denying the Motion to Recall ‘the Mandate, when The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit elected to rehear en banc the precedential foundation . for affirming the sentence enhancement under the Career Criminal Guideline, on the day the conviction became final in this case, and subsequently reversed the erroneous precedent relied upon to affirm the excessibe and incorrect sentence in this case? -i.
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Arian Lamont Brown
Arian Lamont Brown — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent